From: Environmental Law News
pRegulators must figure out if a common method of surface coal
mining is damaging Appalachian watersheds, but may be unable to do
so, a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency official said during
congressional testimony Thursday.p
Respond to this topic on your own blog
Click and press Ctrl+C to copy and paste this discussion on your blog or site
Related Articles
EPA Stops Largest Mountaintop Mining Operation in Appalachia
The Environmental Protection Agency on Friday halted the largest
mountaintop coal mining operation in Appalachia ever to receive a
federal permit--the first time in the EPA's 37-year history that
the agency has used its regulatory power to stop an already
approved project. Mountaintop mining is when coal companies blast
the tops off mountains to get at the coal underneath, dumping
millions of tons of rubble into adjacent valleys, burying streams,
contaminating drinking water, and damaging local communities. Read
more...EPA Stops Largest Mountaintop Mining Operation in Appalachia
originally appeared on About.com Environmental Issues on Monday,
October 19th, 2009 at 03:17:35.Permalink | Comment | Email this
Scientists Urge U.S. Government to Ban Mountaintop Mining
Many environmentalists and coal-country residents have been saying
for years that mountaintop mining must be stopped, and now
scientists have reached the same conclusion. According to a new
study, mountaintop mining (also called mountaintop removal mining)
should be banned immediately for causing severe and lasting damage
to the environment and exposing people to serious health risks,
ranging from lung cancer to birth defects. A team of 12 scientists,
hydrologists and engineers conducted the most comprehensive
analysis to date of the damage done by mountaintop mining, a
controversial form of surface mining that literally blows the tops
off mountains to expose underlying veins of coal. Their findings,
published in the journal Science, surprised the research team and
moved its members to u...
Real protection of watersheds
In the ongoing fallout of Ontario’s unfortunate
response to the Walkerton water disaster, the objective of
Ontario's source protection plans will be too narrow: protecting
the immediate vicinity of sources of drinking water. Watersheds
have many “functions†other than
providing drinking water, and they cannot be successfully managed
with blinders on. Related Posts Source Water protection on to phase
2, Bulk water transfers?, What’s New in Ontario environmental
laws
Citizens Travel to Nation’s Capital to Demand Coal Ash Safeguards
First public hearing on EPA coal ash rule draws nationwide
participation Hundreds of concerned citizens are traveling to the
Hyatt Regency in Arlington, Virginia on August 30 to urge the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency to pass strong, federally
enforceable safeguards for coal ash, the hazardous remains left
over from coal-fired power plant operations. The public hearing is
the first of seven public hearings the EPA is holding on its much
delayed plan to finally regulate toxic coal ash.read more
Impact of New Coal Permitting Guidance Uncertain
The new guidelines may or may not offer stronger protections for
streams. With a great deal of water quality monitoring but not a
lot that's enforceable, new West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection permitting guidance for coal mine water
pollution discharges may or may not represent stronger protections
for streams below mine fills.