From: Connecticut Employment Law Blog
Lost in the shuffle of the COBRA subsidy extension have been new
restrictions that prohibit some defense contractors from using
mandatory arbitration provisions with their employees. The
Washington Employment Law Update does an excellent job at recapping
the relevant provisions and points out that there will be new
certification requirements for such contractors in mid 2010. The
key text of the new law is as follows: (a) None of the funds
appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be
expended for any Federal contract for an amount in excess of
$1,000,000 that is awarded more than 60 days after the effective
date of this Act, unless the contractor agrees not to: (1) enter
into any agreement with any of its employees or independent
contractors that requires, as a condition of...
Respond to this topic on your own blog
Click and press Ctrl+C to copy and paste this discussion on your blog or site
Related Articles
Defense Contractors May Be Barred From Using Pre-Dispute Arbitration Provisions With Employees
Connecticut is chock-full of defense contractors. Which is why an
amendment that was slipped into the Senate defense appropriations
bill should now be one that is closely followed by those
contractors. This week, the Senate approved of an amendment that
will prohibit
defense contractors from requiring their employees sign arbitration
agreements as a condition of their employment. Specifically, the
measure states: None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made
available by this Act may be used for any existing or new Federal
contract if the contractor or a subcontractor at any tier requires
that an emplo...
Mandatory arbitration is out for major defense contractors
Section 8116 of the Defense Appropriations Act signed by the
President on December 21 requires major defense contractors and
subcontractors to agree not to enter into or enforce agreements
with employees or subcontractors that require arbitration of: "any
claim under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or any tort
related to or arising out of sexual assault or harassment,
including assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional
distress, false imprisonment, or negligent hiring, supervision, or
retention." [H.R. 3326 text]
Twas the Night Before Christmas: COBRA Subsidy Extension and Health Care Bill Special Edition
Twas the night before Christmas With a whole bunch of laws, A new
COBRA was stirring, with a health bill (and flaws?) Congress sure
has been busy the last few days. This Christmas Eve morning, the
Senate passed a landmark health care bill. No doubt, it will
continue to be tweaked and modified as the House and Senate seek to
reconcile their respective bills. I don't think you will find
anyone who believes it is perfect and without flaws. But the
passage today ensures that employers are going to have some new
work cut out for them in 2010 as the provisions of the bill start
getting implemented. I will recap the provisions affecting
employers once it becomes a little clearer in the reconciliation
process. Until then, employers can (and should) focus on the COBRA
subsidy exte...
Federal Defense Contractors Cannot Require Arbitration of Discrimination Claims.
The Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2010 (the "Act"),
enacted on December 19, 2009, does more than dole out funds to the
Department of Defense (DOD). Of particular note to federal
contractors, the Act restricts DOD contractors with qualifying
contracts from requiring their employees, as a condition of
employment, to arbitrate claims brought under Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964 and torts "related to or arising out of
sexual assault or harassment."
Defense Appropriations Bill Restricts Federal Defense ContractorsÂ’ Use of Arbitration Agreements.
On December 19, 2009, President Obama signed into law the Fiscal
Year 2010 Department of Defense Appropriations Act (the "Act").
Embedded in this $636 billion spending measure is a provision that
prohibits federal contractors receiving Defense Department funds
for contracts in excess of $1,000,000 from requiring their
employees or independent contractors to arbitrate certain disputes,
including claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Such federal contractors also will be required to certify that
their subcontractors agree to these same restrictions.
![]()